|For more than 2500 years, people have enjoyed a common right to free passage on public waterways. This right can be traced from the Roman era, through such influential documents as the Magna Carta of 1215, to modern times. Canada’s Navigable Waters Protection Act recognizes the public right to navigation in Canadian waters; passed in 1882, it is one of our oldest pieces of federal legislation.|
The Navigable Waters Protection Act recognizes the importance of protecting navigable waterways. At the same time, the Act allows individuals and agencies to proceed with projects that interfere substantially with navigation, provided they obtain approval from the Minister. In this sense, the Act both reinforces the historic common right to navigation for Canadians and creates a legal process for limiting or interfering with this right.
The act of obtaining approval from the Minister triggers a federal environmental assessment process. Through this process, environmental impacts and mitigation measures are determined. This assessment process helps to balance the traditional common right to free passage and the need or desire to construct works on or near navigable waterways.
On April 17, 2008, Waterkeeper received an invitation from Mr. Mervin Tweed, Chair of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, to provide a submission regarding proposed amendments to the Navigable Waters Protection Act. A list of seven proposed changes was included in the letter. Waterkeeper provided written submissions on May 12, 2009 and, on very short notice, had an opportunity to appear before the Transportation Committee on May 29, 2008. To our knowledge, we were the only organization expressing concerns that had an opportunity to appear.
On June 12, 2008, the Transportation Committee presented its recommendation to Parliament and promised additional public consultation would occur. The next time information was released to the public was February, 2009, with the Budget Implementation Act.
Proponents of the new NWPA said the current Act is creating red tape, delay, and additional expense. This is untrue. The Minister already had the authority to exempt projects from the environmental assessment process – anything except for bridges, booms, dams, and causeways which interfere with navigable waters by their very definition.
Despite opposition from the environmental and paddling community, the NWPA was amended along with the budget in 2009, ushering in an era of two-tier environmental protection for Canadian waterways. Born with a Grey Beard is a paper published by Lake Ontario Waterkeeper that tells the story of Canada’s Navigable Waters Protection Act.
Lake Ontario Waterkeeper timeline on the NWPA
- May 8, 2008: NWPA is the focus of Living at the Barricades
- May 12, 2008: Lake Ontario Waterkeeper’s backgrounder on NWPA amendment process:
- May 12, 2008: Lake Ontario Waterkeeper’s written submission to the Transportation Committee
- May 29, 2008: Lake Ontario Waterkeeper’s presentation with Q&A at Transportation Committee
- June 12, 2008: Trans Committee presents recommendations to Parliament and promises public consultation
- January 27, 2009: NWPA amendments are buried in the Budget Implementation Act
- May 7, 2009: Lake Ontario Waterkeeper appears before the Senate Standing Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources
- May 8, 2009: Canadian Government issues new regulations under the NWPA
- May 19, 2009: NWPA is again the topic of Living at the Barricades
- June 2009: Born With A Grey Beard, a paper about the NWPA is presented at the Canadian Heritage Rivers Conference in Ottawa.
- June 11, 2009: The Senate releases its report on the NWPA
- January 2010: Lake Ontario Waterkeeper comments on the first major regulation to be passed under the new NWPA.
Specific concerns with the proposed legislation (2008-2009)
This summary, along with the background below, is available in a printable pdf file. Click here to open or download the summary of our research in pdf.
- The new Navigable Waters Protection Act (NWPA) eliminates environmental assessments for development projects on Canadian waterways, with very few exceptions.
- The new NWPA means decisions about Canada’s waterways will be based on politics and financial clout rather than science or long-term socio-economic needs.
- The new NWPA divides Canada’s rivers into those worth protecting and those not worth protecting.
- The “class” lists may be drafted by the Cabinet in secrecy, with no public consultation, scientific basis, or opportunity for appeal.
Bigger picture concerns:
- The legislation fails to recognize that navigation is a public right, stemming from both Aboriginal and European history. The new NWPA mistakenly presumes that the Government of Canada and its friends, rather than Canadians, own and control our rivers.
- The legislation is part of an ongoing attack on science, transparency, and fairness when it comes to making decisions that affect Canada’s environment. We are seeing similar efforts to gut the Fisheries Act, environmental assessment legislation, and the Environmental Bill of Rights among others. This attack blames “red tape” for standing in the way of progress. In reality, these laws are the only things standing between citizens and a massive sell-off of our waterways from coast-to-coast, be it through pollution, development, or diversion.
- Decouple the new NWPA from the Budget Implementation Act, 2009 so that there can be proper, thorough, and transparent consultation with the public.
- Restore the environmental assessment trigger.
- Remove the Minister’s discretion when it comes to major projects, such as the four named works in the existing legislation: bridge, boom, dam or causeway.
- Eliminate the system for dividing up Canada’s rivers or classifying different types of “works”. In the alternative, create these classes only after significant public consultation and scientific review, allow for exemptions in special cases, and explicitly maintain the existing common law and traditional right to use navigable waters.