home who we are projects support us weekly feature newsroom community sitemap
 
TheSpec.com – Local – Engineer lambastes city for Red Hill Valley Parkway flooding
July 14th, 2010
  

A highly regarded engineer has slammed the City of Hamilton’s decision to build a highway through the area’s last greenspace “come hell or high water.”

Professor Brian Baetz, chair of civil engineering at McMaster, said the engineers behind the Red Hill Valley Parkway do not deserve the blame for continued flooding that put lives at risk in the valley during last week’s flooding.

He likened the project to “building a gazebo on quicksand.”

“They effectively built a road on a flood plain,” he said. “To be frank, I lay this at the feet of the city.”

The former member of Friends of Red Hill Valley said, if the city had planned the project properly, it would have requested emergency planning for a bigger one in 500-year storm rather than planning for a one in 100-year storm, which is what was used.

“We knew almost everything about climate change when this was built,” said the sustainability expert. “If you know that climate change is coming, the city should have sat down with experts to ensure a huge safety net was incorporated into the plans, I’m talking about a 500-year storm.”

In an article published last month in the Canadian Consultancy Engineer publication, Ron Scheckenberger, the project manager of the Red Hill Valley Parkway drainage system, said: “The drainage system for the parkway performed exactly as designed — it flooded exactly where it was predicted to, in the amount that it was predicted to.

“So the question remains: ‘Should expressways be designed to higher or different standards?’

“Only time will tell. With the spectre of climate change on the horizon, there will need to be close attention to standards, and analytical tools will need to keep pace.”

The engineer, from Burlington’s AMEC Earth & Environmental, and former McMaster professor, added: “We could have removed an additional several hectares of greenspace by making the road higher and wider or permanently spent megamillions on it to remove some flood risk. Or we design it like we did and allow it to flood.

“The parkway was designed to provincial standards, which for this type of road is a 100-year storm, that isn’t to say that the city could not exceeded those standards.”

According to Baetz the city should have raised the storm standard because much of the road, especially north of King Street, is built directly on a flood plain.

Without the increased security, he doesn’t believe it should have been built at all.

via TheSpec.com – Local – Engineer lambastes city for Red Hill Valley Parkway flooding.

Other stories like this one ...

Development & Land Use
(Most recent of 3128 articles) Environmental Law
(Most recent of 5728 articles) Fish
(Most recent of 5765 articles) Hamilton and Region
(Most recent of 1245 articles) Sewers & Urban Runoff
(Most recent of 1287 articles)

Lake Ontario Waterkeeper welcomes your responses to the articles posted on our site.
We encourage you to post your thoughts and make every effort to publish your comments as quickly as possible.