home who we are projects support us weekly feature newsroom community sitemap
 
TheSpec.com – Local – Time to act on parkway, public says
July 15th, 2010
  

Something needs to be done, and quick.

That’s the message from Hamilton residents who say they are tired of politicians, engineers and bureaucrats failing to properly deal with the flooding issues on the Red Hill Valley Parkway.

Speaking from a bar stool in a pub on the banks of one of the parkway’s flooding flashpoints on Barton Street, Barry Stewart, of Stoney Creek, sighs as he sips his pint.

“This road took 50 years to build, you’d think they would have got it right,” said the inventory manager. “Climate change is not a new thing. The parkway should have been built to the extremes of safety.

“Why wasn’t the road built higher, so that water would run along its side? The first thing our officials need to do is stop worrying about being told ‘I told you so’ and admit there’s a problem. This has carried on far too long.”

Another patron, Dan Facca, thinks the city either needs to build another overflow pond or widen the grates to avoid smaller debris blocking flood water.

Cindy McGill, who lives near the parkway, is still waiting for the city to deliver on its promise to re-plant “absorption trees” that used to line the valley.

Nancy Green, who was visiting her parents’ plots in Eastlawn Cemetery near the parkway, said Mayor Fred Eisenberger should hold a public meeting to decide on next steps.

“The citizens of this city often have better ideas than our leaders,” she said.

Meanwhile Councillor Terry Whitehead, who called for a review after the first flood of the year, plans to put forward a motion for an independent review of the road’s design at the next committee of the whole on Aug. 10.

“We shouldn’t be jumping to the conclusion that this is all down to climate change, especially without seeing the empirical data,” he said. “We paid millions for this highway, the citizens can’t just be expected to get used to flooding. We need to figure out some solutions. An independent review is the only way to see the wood for the trees.”

via TheSpec.com – Local – Time to act on parkway, public says.

Other stories like this one ...

Development & Land Use
(Most recent of 3128 articles) Environmental Law
(Most recent of 5728 articles) Fish
(Most recent of 5765 articles) Hamilton and Region
(Most recent of 1245 articles) Sewers & Urban Runoff
(Most recent of 1287 articles)
  1. Lake Ontario Waterkeeper wrote:
    July 22nd, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    JULIE BREZDEN
    THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR
    HAMILTON
    RED HILL VALLEY NEIGHBOURHOODS ASSOCIATION (RHVNA)
    (Jul 21, 2010)
    Re: ‘Drainage screens (could be) cause of flooding’ (Column, July 16) and ‘Time to act on parkway, public says’ (July 15)

    The City of Hamilton is facing a serious problem which cannot be ignored.

    The flooding of the Red Hill Valley Parkway four times within a year comes as no surprise to some of us.

    Had the city allowed the environmental assessment to go forward, this problem — as well as all the other problems associated with the parkway — could have been resolved beforehand.

    However that was then, this is now. Band-Aid solutions — such as warning signage and working on more efficient response mechanisms; or blaming the cause on climate change (which was already well understood back in 1999-2001, and accepted by governments around the world in the 1997 Kyoto agreement), or the mesh screens covering the drainage culverts getting clogged with debris; or simply denying there are possible design problems with the parkway storage water drainage system — will not cut it this time.

    If this problem is to be resolved properly, an independent review is definitely needed.

    However hard man tries, he will never outsmart Mother Nature and the raging Red Hill Creek.

Lake Ontario Waterkeeper welcomes your responses to the articles posted on our site.
We encourage you to post your thoughts and make every effort to publish your comments as quickly as possible.