home who we are projects support us weekly feature newsroom community sitemap
 
Environmental cutbacks discussed in Ontario legislature (Nov 29, 2011)
December 3rd, 2011
  

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Mr. Jonah Schein: Speaker, this question is to the Minister of the Environment. Ontarians want the government to protect—

Interjections.

The Speaker (Hon. Dave Levac): Order. The member from Pembroke will come to order––the second time, please.

Member?

Mr. Jonah Schein: Thank you.

Ontarians want the government to protect our lakes, our rivers and air, but today the Environmental Commissioner reports that the Ministries of the Environment and Natural Resources face a crisis of capacity. While they’ve been given more responsibility to deal with increasing threats to the environment, their budgets have been cut by 45% and 22% respectively since the 1990s.

Will the McGuinty government heed the commissioner’s call to rebuild these ministries or will a clean environment be another casualty of upcoming cuts?

Hon. James J. Bradley: Well, I know that the member probably forgot to mention this, and I forgive him for it, but he will be aware that since our government took office we have in fact increased the Ministry of the Environment budget by some 42%.

I welcome the report of the Environmental Commissioner. It’s excellent. As the new minister, I have an opportunity to look at all of his recommendations. I have a great deal of respect for the commissioner.

I know that you forgot, as well, to mention some of the good things that he said about the government of Ontario. I forgive you. He said that he commends MOE for developing a source protection strategy. He says that the ministry has built early, multi-stage notice and consultation into the source protection planning process. He lauds the ministry on its new publicly accessible approvals database. He says that we’re developing new, more stringent limits—

The Speaker (Hon. Dave Levac): Thank you. Supplementary?

Mr. Jonah Schein: Mr. Speaker, to the environment minister: The Environmental Commissioner said there is a “culture of inaction and procrastination” on issues like climate change and waste diversion. The Ministries of the Environment and Natural Resources simply are not able to properly monitor and enforce landfilling, incineration, waste hauling and other polluting activities.

Will the minister assure Ontarians that the capacity of these ministries will not be further undermined by upcoming cuts, or is the environment one of the areas slated for a 30% slash in funding?

Hon. James J. Bradley: I should mention, as well—I forgot to mention this—that the Ministry of the Environment, since our government took office, has hired some 39 new water inspectors.

I want to tell the member that if you’re looking at initiatives that are extremely important for the environment, you know that despite the fact that some of your members were unfortunately opposed to this, we are eliminating the use of coal for the production of electrical power in the province of Ontario. The former member for Kenora–Rainy River will be listening to this, I know, at this particular point in time.

We have also developed the green energy plan, which is accentuating the need for and the implementation of more benign ways of producing electrical power in this province of Ontario. We have the source protection act, which we’re being lauded for internationally, and I want to commend our people in our homes who are using that blue box program in a very exemplary manner.

The Speaker (Hon. Dave Levac): Thank you. New question?

via Legislative Assembly of Ontario | Debates & Proceedings | Debates (Hansard) | Official Records for 29 November 2011.


  

Other stories like this one ...

Drink
(Most recent of 3872 articles) Environmental Law
(Most recent of 5814 articles) Fish
(Most recent of 5877 articles) Ontario
(Most recent of 3482 articles) Swim
(Most recent of 2376 articles)
 
Richard Reinert wrote:
December 16th, 2011 at 8:46 pm

Dear Waterkeeper,
I appreciate your reporting of important lake issues. Thank you for that.
I am extremely concerned about the backing off of federal and provincial legislation that might secure a more reasonable use of our natural resources, and therefore that of humanity.
The moratorium that the Province of Ontario placed on building off-shore electric generating wind turbines being one of the more egregious examples.
Coupled with the hysteria raised among rural populations by a centralized source (Wind Concerns Ontario), which used propaganda in hyperbole to frighten people against wind turbines. They were even joined by Waterkeeper.ca in opposition to these important potential sources of energy off shore of Ontario’s coastline.
There is no question in my mind that the McGuinty administration put a moratorium on off-shore wind turbines because they feared a collaboration between Scarborough Bluffs opponents and folks in rural counties would mean an end to the Ontario Liberal majority government.
So what’s happening now?
Wjhat happened to the so-called Ontario Green Energy act?
Who is investigating these adverse effects that wind turbines purportedly cause?
Why is Waterkeeper not pounding on the doors of provincial leaders to find out?
I know Waterkeeper opposes nuclear power plants, as do I. But Waterkeeper also opposes off-shore wind turbines, I assume, for environmental reasons. Am I wrong? What other reasons could there be? the aesthetic loss of an unbroken horizon?
Why are you not insisting that research should be undertaken ASAP to determine whether or not the negative effects of off-shore wind turbines outweigh their benefits?
Since it opposed the erection of off-shore wind turbines, I think this is an obligation of Waterkeeper. And don’t pass the buck!
Richard Reinert, Ph.D. (physical oceanography)
Toronto