Contact

Store

About

Issues
News
Guides
Lake Ontario
Media
Get Involved
Donate Now

Search

Home
Issues
News
Guides
Lake Ontario
Media
Get Involved
About
Contact
Store
Donate Now
News

Waukesha: A small town raises big questions

Published on February 05, 2016 by Tristan Willis.

Overlooking Lake Michigan. Waukesha, suburb of Milwaukee, aims to divert their water supply enabling them to source their drinking water from the lake. (Photo via  Rachel Kramer .)

Overlooking Lake Michigan. Waukesha, suburb of Milwaukee, aims to divert their water supply enabling them to source their drinking water from the lake. (Photo via Rachel Kramer.)

In 1998, the Nova Group of Sault Ste. Marie received a permit to take 600 billion litres of water from Lake Superior each year and sell it overseas. The Ontario Ministry of the Environment, who issued the permit, hadn’t consulted with Quebec or any of the US States before making this decision. When the public caught wind of what was happening, there was outcry on both sides of the border and the permit was eventually cancelled.

The controversy surrounding the Nova Group permit helped to initiate a cross border conversation about protecting the Great Lakes water supply. In 2001, Ontario, Quebec and 8 States* added an Annex to the Great Lakes Charter that dealt with bulk water export. Although this was a step forward the annex had numerous shortcomings and in 2005 the two Provinces and 8 States entered into a good faith agreement called the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement. By 2008 legislation had been passed to make this agreement binding in both Canada and the US. 

The Sustainable Water Resources Agreement was developed in consultation with First Nations groups, US Tribes and both the US and Canadian Federal Government. With a few exceptions, it prohibits the diversion of water outside the Great Lakes basin and restricts diversions of water within the basin. 

The Agreement also addresses the question of when a community that straddles the basin will be allowed to draw water from the Lake. Once such community is Waukesha. Waukesha has high levels of radon in its water supply. The town is eager to solve the problem by piping in water from Lake Michigan and is seeking permission to to do so. Under the Agreement, diversions by straddler communities are permitted, but only if certain criteria are met. These criteria include requirements like showing that there aren’t reasonably alternatives or that the community's water needs couldn’t be met through water conservation. There is also a requirement that the water be treated and returned to the watershed after use (although leeway is allowed for the inevitable loss that occurs through evaporation, incorporation into products and other processes).

Waukesha’s application to divert water is the first to arise since the Agreement came into force in 2008. The standard applied to Waukesha will set the precedent for future applications. And there will be future applications. So while Waukesha’s proposed diversion might be but a drop in the metaphorical bucket, it’s important because it will set the course for what comes next. 

In the past, the immensity of the Great Lakes has helped us ignore their vulnerability. While it’s easy to downplay the impact of a small diversion, experts have said that human use must draw no more than 1% of the Great Lakes volume per year. With the increased evaporation rates that will come with climate change this figure might also be high. 

The takeaway here is that the handling of Waukesha’s application will have long term-consequences. The Sustainable Water Resources Agreement will only work if the criteria it establishes are properly adhered to. Various conservation organizations have already raised serious concerns about Waukesha’s application. It’s important for Ontario to take part in this process and make sure that a bad precedent isn’t set. The Canadian Environmental Law Association and 6 other individuals organization have taken the lead by writing to the Ontario government and urging it to act. Let’s hope Ontario listens. 

*The 8 States are: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Great Lakes, swim drink fish

Newer Articles Older Articles
Featured
Gord Edgar Downie Pier T-shirt
Gord Edgar Downie Pier T-shirt

This shirt commemorates the Gord Edgar Downie Pier in Kingston, Ontario. The City of Kingston and Swim Drink Fish Canada unveiled the pier on July 26, 2018.

100% of our proceeds support our core initiatives so Canadian communities can prosper.

Blog Categories

  • Deloro (2)
  • Eastern Mainline Pipeline (2)
  • American Eel (3)
  • King's Mill Park (4)
  • Castonguay (5)
  • Gifford Hill (5)
  • Pickering (5)
  • Skip the Wash (5)
  • Swim Guide (6)
  • Enbridge-Line9 (9)
  • Events and Meetings (9)
  • GreatLakes Protection Act (10)
  • Waterkeeper Gala (10)
  • Press Releases (11)
  • TO Island Airport (14)
  • Microbeads (15)
  • WestonGreatLakesChallenge (15)
  • 2014 Challenge (16)
  • Microplastics (16)
  • Red Hill Valley Express (20)
  • PortHope RadioactiveWaste (25)
  • TorontoHarbour Monitoring (30)
  • Canadian rollbacks (34)
  • Darlington Refurbishment (46)
  • Toronto Sewage Bypasses (65)

Blog History

  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • February 2012
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • September 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • March 2007
  • October 2006
  • August 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • June 2005
  • April 2005
  • February 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • December 2002
  • November 2002
  • August 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • March 2002
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
Donate Now
Lake Ontario
Cases
Blog
Events
Store
Contact
Guides
Great Lakes Guide
Swim Guide
Drink Guide
Media
Get Involved
Donate
Volunteer
Report Pollution
Events
Sponsor A Beach
About
History
Staff

Search

Waterkeeper, Swim Drink Fish, and the Swim Drink Fish design (icons) are registered trademarks of Lake Ontario Waterkeeper.