Contact

Store

About

Issues
News
Guides
Lake Ontario
Media
Get Involved
Donate Now

Search

Home
Issues
News
Guides
Lake Ontario
Media
Get Involved
About
Contact
Store
Donate Now
News

Triclosan added to List of Toxic Substances, but more is needed for protection

Published on February 15, 2017 by Posted by Lake Ontario Waterkeeper.

Considered toxic, triclosan is a synthetic chemical that is often found in consumer products and washing into waterways.  (Photo by  Mike Mozart )

Considered toxic, triclosan is a synthetic chemical that is often found in consumer products and washing into waterways.  (Photo by Mike Mozart)

After a scientific assessment and years of consultation, the Government of Canada has decided to add triclosan to the List of Toxic Substances in the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

Triclosan is a substance often seen in personal care products, like antibacterial soap and toothpaste. It was first used in hospitals in the 1960s to help stop the growth and spread of bacteria. It has since grown in popularity and is now seen in thousands of consumer products around the world, 1,600 in Canada alone.

In recent years, however, numerous studies have shown it has harmful effects on the environment and on human health:

  • Triclosan breaks down and forms toxic byproducts, such as dioxins, a known cancer-causing agent.
  • Wastewater treatment plants can’t always filter it out, so products that contain triclosan that get flushed down the drain can end up in the water.
  • Triclosan is an endocrine disruptor, meaning it interferes with hormone function in humans and wildlife.
  • Triclosan encourages bacterial resistance to antibiotics, meaning it has the opposite effect of its intended purpose of keeping us healthy.  

The Government of Canada has officially recognized the harmful effect triclosan has on the environment and is the reason for adding it to the List of Toxic Substances. However, despite numerous scientific studies and bans from other countries, Health Canada has concluded that triclosan is not a human health concern and will not be banning the substance from personal care products. Instead of an outright ban, Health Canada is calling for maximum acceptable limits in cosmetic products: a concentration of triclosan of no more than 0.03% in mouthwashes and 0.3% in other cosmetics, such as soaps.

This plan is inadequate. More protections are needed, both for the environment and our health.

This is why Lake Ontario Waterkeeper recently signed on to a joint statement, alongside more than 30 other organizations, asking the government to reconsider its stance on triclosan.

Specifically, the 30+ organizations involved in the submission make the following seven recommendations: 

Recommendation: We support the order to add triclosan to the Toxic Substances List (Schedule 1) to CEPA 1999.

Recommendation: We do not support the use of a non-regulatory tool such as Pollution Prevention Plans to address triclosan levels in the environment.

Recommendation: We urge the government to reconsider a regulatory tool that would prohibit the use of triclosan in consumer products.

Recommendation: We urge the government to consider the 20 recent studies that have been referenced in a detailed submission on triclosan by environmental and health groups submitted January 26, 2017 (See Appendix).

Recommendation: We urge the government to require informed substitution (including the option of omitting antimicrobial additives) by applying alternative assessments, to avoid regrettable substitutions to triclosan, to address potential contributions to antimicrobial resistance, and to ensure safe substitutes for triclosan.  

Recommendation: We urge the government to recognize and to improve its communication and awareness efforts to inform the public that plain soap and warm water are just as effective as antibacterials for disease prevention. Increased focus on this approach will avoid the use of alternatives (including triclocarban) that may have similar environmental and health impacts to triclosan.

Recommendation: We urge the government to expedite assessment, including cumulative assessment of other antimicrobial chemicals (e.g. triclocarban) in consumer products, for environmental and health reasons, as well as curtail development of antimicrobial resistance.

Be sure to check below for the full submission, which also includes more information on the effects triclosan has on the environment and human health.

Environment and Health Groups' Statement on Triclosan from LOWaterkeeper

What you can do

To better protect our waterways, the easiest and best thing to do is to just avoid products containing triclosan altogether. Check the ingredient list on your soaps, toothpastes, shampoos, and other personal care products. Cosmetics and non-prescription drugs are required to list triclosan if it is an ingredient.

 

Comment here before February 11th, 2018:

Triclosan: Pollution prevention planning consultation
 

triclosan, Environmental Protection Act

Newer Articles Older Articles
Featured
Gord Edgar Downie Pier T-shirt
Gord Edgar Downie Pier T-shirt

This shirt commemorates the Gord Edgar Downie Pier in Kingston, Ontario. The City of Kingston and Swim Drink Fish Canada unveiled the pier on July 26, 2018.

100% of our proceeds support our core initiatives so Canadian communities can prosper.

Blog Categories

  • Deloro (2)
  • Eastern Mainline Pipeline (2)
  • American Eel (3)
  • King's Mill Park (4)
  • Castonguay (5)
  • Gifford Hill (5)
  • Pickering (5)
  • Skip the Wash (5)
  • Swim Guide (6)
  • Enbridge-Line9 (9)
  • Events and Meetings (9)
  • GreatLakes Protection Act (10)
  • Waterkeeper Gala (10)
  • Press Releases (11)
  • TO Island Airport (14)
  • Microbeads (15)
  • WestonGreatLakesChallenge (15)
  • 2014 Challenge (16)
  • Microplastics (16)
  • Red Hill Valley Express (20)
  • PortHope RadioactiveWaste (25)
  • TorontoHarbour Monitoring (30)
  • Canadian rollbacks (34)
  • Darlington Refurbishment (46)
  • Toronto Sewage Bypasses (65)

Blog History

  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • February 2012
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • September 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • March 2007
  • October 2006
  • August 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • June 2005
  • April 2005
  • February 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • December 2002
  • November 2002
  • August 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • March 2002
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
Donate Now
Lake Ontario
Cases
Blog
Events
Store
Contact
Guides
Great Lakes Guide
Swim Guide
Drink Guide
Media
Get Involved
Donate
Volunteer
Report Pollution
Events
Sponsor A Beach
About
History
Staff

Search

Waterkeeper, Swim Drink Fish, and the Swim Drink Fish design (icons) are registered trademarks of Lake Ontario Waterkeeper.