Contact

Store

About

Issues
News
Guides
Lake Ontario
Media
Get Involved
Donate Now

Search

Home
Issues
News
Guides
Lake Ontario
Media
Get Involved
About
Contact
Store
Donate Now
News

Something fishy in Hamilton Harbour

Published on August 20, 2007 by Dylan Neild.

The Fisheries Act is failing in Hamilton Harbour. Not, it seems, because the law is weak or unclear. Not, it seems, because the cause of the Harbour's problems is unknown. But, it seems, because no one enforces the Fisheries Act in Hamilton Harbour anymore.

There are two key ways that the Fisheries Act protects Canadian waterways from acts of pollution. First, the Act makes it illegal to deposit harmful substances into waters where fish live. Second, the Act makes it illegal to destroy fish habitat. So why are these two activities “ dumping contaminants and destroying fish habitat “ happening in Hamilton Harbour?

It is no secret that industry has contaminated Hamilton Harbour. One of the most notorious hot spots on the Great Lakes is there, known affectionately as Randle Reef. The Reef is actually a mass of coal tar and heavy metals roughly three metres deep and eight hectares across, deposited into Lake Ontario by the steel industry over decades. Despite the Reef's impact on fish in the Harbour, no person or corporation has ever been charged.

More recently, the Hamilton Harbour Commissioners (now the Hamilton Port Authority) filled in part of the mouth of Sherman Inlet in order to create more land. The Inlet was one of the few remaining natural areas in the Harbour. It appears as though the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans warned the Harbour Commissioners that filling in Sherman Inlet would violate the Fisheries Act, but the Harbour Commissioners proceeded anyway. When the Hamilton Spectator released this news on July 17, 2007, citizens responded with outrage. Federal and Provincial spokespeople offered platitudes and cash. Unless citizens act, no one will be charged.

Then last week, the Premier of Ontario gave a press conference on a boat in the Harbour and announced $30-million in funding for remediation of Randle Reef. By remediation, he means capping and filling, leaving the heavy metals and PAHs where they are, covering them with contaminated sediments from other parts of the harbour, and then paving over the whole lot to create up to 10-hectares of new land. Which is also up to 10-hectares less harbour.

The irony is thick. First, the head of Fisheries and Oceans' enforcement arm in Ontario said he doesn't believe in enforcement, so he has no intention of charging the Port Authority for violating the Fisheries Act: "We work with individuals, companies and government entities. Our goal at the end of the day is to have a net gain in fish habitat. We sit down and do our best to keep from going to litigation, in the best interests of the Canadian public," he told the Hamilton Spectator.

Second, the federal fisheries biologist said that Sherman Inlet could be restored when Randle Reef is covered over. The new habitat created by undoing the mess in the Inlet will help compensate for the existing habitat that is being destroyed by the cap and fill project on the Reef.

Only that's not how the Fisheries Act is supposed to work. There is nothing in the Act that says a company can deposit a deleterious substance into waters frequented by fish if government is willing to spend taxpayer dollars to clean it up a generation later. There is nothing in the Act that says a federal agency can destroy fish habitat without authorization as long as there is worse habitat destruction nearby. Those are decisions that government has made without scrutiny and without public consultation.

Under the Act, the community would not be asked to choose between habitat in the harbour and habitat in the inlet. Under the Act, the community would get both.

People are aching for real success in Hamilton Harbour. After years of contamination and development, it's almost hard to believe that remediation is a possibility. Hamiltonians want to see fish habitat restored, to see great swaths of healthy, diverse shoreline habitat. Most importantly, they want to know that their harbour, for the first time in a century, is receiving the best protection Canada can offer.

blog

Newer Articles Older Articles
Featured
Gord Edgar Downie Pier T-shirt
Gord Edgar Downie Pier T-shirt

This shirt commemorates the Gord Edgar Downie Pier in Kingston, Ontario. The City of Kingston and Swim Drink Fish Canada unveiled the pier on July 26, 2018.

100% of our proceeds support our core initiatives so Canadian communities can prosper.

Blog Categories

  • Deloro (2)
  • Eastern Mainline Pipeline (2)
  • American Eel (3)
  • King's Mill Park (4)
  • Castonguay (5)
  • Gifford Hill (5)
  • Pickering (5)
  • Skip the Wash (5)
  • Swim Guide (6)
  • Enbridge-Line9 (9)
  • Events and Meetings (9)
  • GreatLakes Protection Act (10)
  • Waterkeeper Gala (10)
  • Press Releases (11)
  • TO Island Airport (14)
  • Microbeads (15)
  • WestonGreatLakesChallenge (15)
  • 2014 Challenge (16)
  • Microplastics (16)
  • Red Hill Valley Express (20)
  • PortHope RadioactiveWaste (25)
  • TorontoHarbour Monitoring (30)
  • Canadian rollbacks (34)
  • Darlington Refurbishment (46)
  • Toronto Sewage Bypasses (65)

Blog History

  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • February 2012
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • September 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • March 2007
  • October 2006
  • August 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • June 2005
  • April 2005
  • February 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • December 2002
  • November 2002
  • August 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • March 2002
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
Donate Now
Lake Ontario
Cases
Blog
Events
Store
Contact
Guides
Great Lakes Guide
Swim Guide
Drink Guide
Media
Get Involved
Donate
Volunteer
Report Pollution
Events
Sponsor A Beach
About
History
Staff

Search

Waterkeeper, Swim Drink Fish, and the Swim Drink Fish design (icons) are registered trademarks of Lake Ontario Waterkeeper.